Hollywood has long been obsessed with Russians and Soviets playing baddies, and recent films show that the end of the Cold War clearly did not mean the end of Russian villainy.
Arbitror sees the world neither as a monolithic “big picture” nor as disparate parts, but instead as an ever-changing network of ideas, actors, and transnational forces.
Witness with us.
*
All tagged Russia
Hollywood has long been obsessed with Russians and Soviets playing baddies, and recent films show that the end of the Cold War clearly did not mean the end of Russian villainy.
Moscow increasingly wants a greater share of tax and hydrocarbon revenues, meanwhile giving fewer state resources to the regions and oppressing minority culture and language where it can.
Iranian President Rouhani said that Iran honors its deals, unlike the United States—a clear slap in the face to U.S. diplomacy and the president.
The weapons of the future are data, and the Western-led world order must accept this new reality or make room for a new world order.
Domestic stability and national security go hand in hand with this particular problem, but it seems that few truly understand what is at risk.
It seems that experienced foreign policy wonks and the newcomers of the of the Trump Administration are at odds in the latest National Security Strategy.
Displaced ethnic Georgians seeking to return to their homeland in Abkhazia face an uphill battle with the laws pertinent to their citizenship in the region--also a country that is not internationally recognized.
Natural born U.S. citizenship, 35 years of age, and... not much else. Is this a problem?
If events like this were occurring while the Cold War raged—during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, for example—the country would be in an uproar.
How much do Trump and Nixon really resemble one another?
Georgia is having a hard time escaping Russia's sphere of influence.
In sum: who knows.
“If we have them, why can’t we use them?” asked an incredulous Donald Trump recently on the subject of nuclear weapons. As if on cue, his statement was rightfully denounced and derided, as has become tradition in the American news cycle. But he inadvertently brought up something surprisingly salient: why exactly not?